<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-7"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ITA Wealth Management &#187; Books</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lherr.org/blog/category/books/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lherr.org/blog</link>
	<description>Dedicated to portfolio construction and management.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 12:39:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>&#8220;Beating the Market&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.lherr.org/blog/2008/07/07/beating-the-market/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lherr.org/blog/2008/07/07/beating-the-market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 20:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Physlab</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lherr.org/blog/?p=824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
&#8220;Beating the Market, 3 Months as a Time&#8221; is the title of Gerald and Marvin Appel&#8217;s new book.  The thesis of the book can be explained in a few paragraphs and it goes like this.
&#8220;Once every three months, you should select from among the best-performing ETFs from the last quarter to hold in your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lherr.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/dsc_0204_edited-1.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-825" title="dsc_0204_edited-1" src="http://www.lherr.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/dsc_0204_edited-1.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="426" /></a></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">&#8220;<strong><em><span style="color: #800000;">Beating the Market, 3 Months as a Time</span></em></strong>&#8221; is the title of Gerald and Marvin Appel&#8217;s new book.  The thesis of the book can be explained in a few paragraphs and it goes like this.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">&#8220;Once every three months, you should select from among the best-performing ETFs from the last quarter to hold in your portfolio for the coming quarter.&#8221;  That is the key Appel &amp; Appel idea.  One selects two ETFs from five basic equity  investment styles and they are as follows.  I am including the Vanguard equivalent.<br />
 </span></p>
<ul>
<li>U.S. large-cap value  (VTV)</li>
<li>U.S large-cap growth  (VUG)</li>
<li>U.S. small-cap value  (VBR)</li>
<li>U.S. small-cap growth  (VBK)</li>
<li>International  (VEU)</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Of interest would be data that included mid-cap value and mid-cap growth, REITs, and emerging markets.  Then invest in three or four of the nine best performing ETFs.  Yes, it is a little more complicated, but not a significant complication.</span></p>
<p>Lowell Herr</p>
<p>Photograph:  Overlooking the Sacred Valley of Peru out to the Andes to the west.</p>
<p>Premium Content available for $6.99 per month.  Register now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lherr.org/blog/2008/07/07/beating-the-market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cap-Weighted vs. Fair-Value-Weighted Portfolios</title>
		<link>http://www.lherr.org/blog/2008/07/23/cap-weighted-vs-fair-value-weighted-portfolios/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lherr.org/blog/2008/07/23/cap-weighted-vs-fair-value-weighted-portfolios/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Physlab</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lherr.org/blog/?p=866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
In the forward of Robert Arnott&#8217;s new book, &#8220;The Fundamental Index: A Better Way to Invest,&#8221; Harry Markowitz poses this argument.
&#8220;Suppose we have four companies, each with $1 in reported earnings.  Suppose two of these have ample future growth prospect that would justify a price 20 times the current profits, or $20, and the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lherr.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/lightning.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-867" title="lightning" src="http://www.lherr.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/lightning.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="425" /></a></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">In the forward of Robert Arnott&#8217;s new book, &#8220;<span style="color: #0000ff;"><em>The Fundamental Index: A Better Way to Invest</em></span>,&#8221; Harry Markowitz poses this argument.</span></p>
<p>&#8220;Suppose we have four companies, each with $1 in reported earnings.  Suppose two of these have ample future growth prospect that would justify a price 20 times the current profits, or $20, and the other two have less impressive prospects and fully deserve $10 &#8212; 10 times the current earnings.  <em>But, no one can have a clear view of the future prospects of our companies, so the market merely guesses at these fair values. </em>Suppose the market does a pretty good job, but misjudges those prospects by 20 percent in each of the four cases, with one growth stock priced 20 percent too high and one 20 percent too low, and likewise for the value stocks.  So, we have two stocks with a true value of $20 each, priced at $24 and $16, and two stocks with a true value of $10, priced at $12 and $8.&#8221;</p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">This is not hard to follow so far. Markowitz goes on to make the argument as to why value portfolios perform better than cap-weighted portfolios.<br />
</span></p>
<p>&#8220;Suppose prices revert to fair value in the next year.  The &#8220;cap-weighted&#8221; portfolio produces zero return; since the prices are symmetric around value, the errors cancel.  If we could construct a fair-value-weighted portfolio, few would disagree that it should be better than capitalization weighting.  It is.  Half of our portfolio rises 25 percent in value, and half loses 16.7%, for an average of 4.2 percent return.  Why?  Because the fair value portfolio puts equal amounts in over- and undervalued stocks, while capitalization weighting put 60 percent of our money in the overvalued and 40 percent in the undervalued companies.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Since we have no idea what the fair value is for each company, and so there&#8217;s no way for us to construct this fair-value-weighted portfolio, why should we care that fair value weighting beats capitalization weighting?  What of the other construction methods?  The portfolios weighted equally and by company profits (efficiency -weighted), which lead to the same weighting in this example, produce a return of 4.2 percent also, identically the same as the fair-value-weighted portfolio!&#8221;</p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Take time to pencil out the Markowitz argument above.</span></p>
<p>Lowell Herr</p>
<p>Photograph:  Lightening over Portland, OR &#8212; Image by David Vernier</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lherr.org/blog/2008/07/23/cap-weighted-vs-fair-value-weighted-portfolios/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Five Best Asset Allocation Books</title>
		<link>http://www.lherr.org/blog/2008/08/07/the-five-best-asset-allocation-books/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lherr.org/blog/2008/08/07/the-five-best-asset-allocation-books/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Physlab</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asset Allocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beginning Investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bernstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ferri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gibson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hebner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lherr.org/blog/?p=895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Investors interested in digging deeper into the nuances of asset allocation will find the following five books of interest.  Here is my list of the five best books on asset allocation.

The Four Pillars of Investing: Lessons for Building a Winning Portfolio
Asset Allocation: Balancing Financial Risk
Index Funds: The 12-Step Program for Active Investors
All About Asset [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lherr.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/img_7797.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-896" title="img_7797" src="http://www.lherr.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/img_7797.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="410" /></a></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Investors interested in digging deeper into the nuances of asset allocation will find the following five books of interest.  Here is my list of the five best books on asset allocation.</span></p>
<ul>
<li>The Four Pillars of Investing: Lessons for Building a Winning Portfolio</li>
<li>Asset Allocation: Balancing Financial Risk</li>
<li>Index Funds: The 12-Step Program for Active Investors</li>
<li>All About Asset Allocation: The Easy Way To Get Started</li>
<li>The Intelligent Asset Allocator</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">William Bernstein, of Oregon, is the author of my number one and number five picks.  Actually, The <span style="color: #008000;"><em><strong>Intelligent Asset Allocator</strong></em></span> is my favorite, but I would not recommend it as the first to read as the others are better for readers not as familiar with the asset allocation language.  Begin your journey with <span style="color: #008000;"><em><strong>The Four Pillars</strong></em></span>.<br />
 </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Roger C. Gibson, in his <span style="color: #008000;"><em><strong>Asset Allocation</strong></em></span> (number two pick) book does a remarkable job of showing why one should build a diversified portfolio.  However, I am still waiting for an author who will provide compelling data for using over ten different asset classes.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Mark T. Hebner provides one of the best overviews for passive or index investing.  In his <span style="color: #008000;"><em><strong>Index Funds</strong></em></span> book, Hebner goes into the history and research for this approach to investing.  If cost is an issue, this book is a best buy.  I also recommend visiting the <a href="http://www.ifa.com/">IFA web site</a> as it is one of the very best available.  I provide a link off to the right under &#8220;Links.&#8221;<br />
 </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Richard A. Ferri, in his <span style="color: #008000;"><em><strong>All About Asset Allocation</strong></em></span> book, fulfills the goals of the book title.  Ferri supports our contention that a portfolio should be tilted toward the value side of the market spectrum.  In this book you will learn why asset allocation is the most important investment decision you will make.<br />
 </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">The <span style="color: #008000;"><em><strong>Intelligent Asset Allocator</strong></em></span> is one of my all-time favorite investing books.  Complete your summer, fall, and winter reading with this book.  Bernstein has a writing style that will leave you smiling despite the challenging material.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">If anyone has a favorite book on asset allocation, please add it to this list under the comments section.  Your contributions are most welcome.</span></p>
<p>Lowell Herr</p>
<p>Photograph:  Lima, Peru students taking a snack break.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><em><strong>Premium subscription available for <span style="color: #0000ff;">$5.00</span> per month through December 31, 2009.  Track the construction, management and performance of six portfolios.  Learn how to use the Thomas/Lalla/Herr portfolio management spreadsheet.<br />
 </strong></em></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lherr.org/blog/2008/08/07/the-five-best-asset-allocation-books/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill Moyers Interviews Andrew J. Bacevich</title>
		<link>http://www.lherr.org/blog/2008/08/18/bill-moyers-interviews-andrew-j-bacevich/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lherr.org/blog/2008/08/18/bill-moyers-interviews-andrew-j-bacevich/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 21:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Physlab</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bacevich]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lherr.org/blog/?p=938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After watching Part I of Bill Moyers interview of Andrew J. Bacevich, I was going to put off this post until the weekend.  Then I watched Part II and decided this is too important to put off a few more days.  I missed this PBS program on Friday night, but picked it off [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: medium;">After watching Part I of <a href="http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/08152008/watch.html">Bill Moyers interview of Andrew J. Bacevich</a>, I was going to put off this post until the weekend.  Then I watched Part II and decided this is too important to put off a few more days.  I missed this PBS program on Friday night, but picked it off the Internet this afternoon.  It is one of the most important and gripping interviews I&#8217;ve seen in a long time.  Do not miss it and be sure to pass the URL on to anyone you know on the net.<br />
 </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Mr. Bacevich is the author of &#8220;<span style="color: #008000;"><em><strong>The Limits of Power:  The End of American Exceptionalism</strong></em></span>.&#8221; </span></p>
<p>Lowell</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lherr.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/dsc_0018.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-939" title="dsc_0018" src="http://www.lherr.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/dsc_0018.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="500" /></a></p>
<p>Photograph: Istanbul, Turkey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lherr.org/blog/2008/08/18/bill-moyers-interviews-andrew-j-bacevich/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Asset Allocation Philosophy</title>
		<link>http://www.lherr.org/blog/2008/09/05/asset-allocation-philosophy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lherr.org/blog/2008/09/05/asset-allocation-philosophy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 09:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Physlab</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asset Allocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lherr.org/blog/?p=993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Why use the principles of asset allocation when constructing a portfolio?  The logic for this approach is based on research done by Ibbotson &#38; Associates and many others.  Look up Ibbotson on this blog for more information.  We skew or tilt the portfolio toward the value side of the market spectrum as value tends to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lherr.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/p6131971_edited.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-994" title="p6131971_edited" src="http://www.lherr.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/p6131971_edited.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="480" /></a></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Why use the principles of asset allocation when constructing a portfolio?  The logic for this approach is based on research done by Ibbotson &amp; Associates and many others.  Look up Ibbotson on this blog for more information.  We skew or tilt the portfolio toward the value side of the market spectrum as value tends to outperform growth over the long run.  Fama &amp; French have studies that back this position.  Personal experience also supports this conclusion.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">If one needs more supporting proof as to the advantages of asset allocation, I highly recommend skeptics begin reading my <a href="http://www.lherr.org/blog/?s=Five+Best+Asset+Allocation+Books">five top investment book</a>s.  Some readers will be won over to the asset allocation argument quickly, while for others it may take years. </span></p>
<p>Lowell Herr</p>
<p>Photograph:  Wetlands in Ocean City, Maryland</p>
<p>Premium Content subscription is only $6.99 per month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lherr.org/blog/2008/09/05/asset-allocation-philosophy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
